dc.contributor.author |
Harb, Ibrahim Moheisen |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-07-30T07:53:48Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-07-30T07:53:48Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1985-8000 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://journal.uob.edu.bh:443/handle/123456789/1398 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
According to the principle of double degree judgment, it is not allowed to present a new judicial demand directly at the court of appeal. This important role had been developed in the modern legislation, who had accepted some exceptions and never considered the principle concerned with the public order. The Jordanian legislation still handle with the traditional role of this principle inspite of the need of reviewing all the matters deal with the basic of prevention so as to improve our justice system as well as the modern legislations do. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Bahrain |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International |
* |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
* |
dc.subject |
Civil Appeal |
|
dc.subject |
Basic Prevention |
|
dc.subject |
Justice System |
|
dc.title |
New Demand in Civil Appeal |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.doi |
http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/LAW/100106 |
|
dc.volume |
10 |
|
dc.issue |
01 |
|
dc.source.title |
Journal of Law |
|
dc.abbreviatedsourcetitle |
LAW |
|