The respecting of the rules of litigation levels upon the court of matters urgency according «Study in Jordanian law and Oman law»

Abstract

This study examines the respecting of litigation levels upon the court of matters urgency according - study in Jordanian law and Omani law. This study examines in the first section, the principle of respecting litigation levels in the magistrates’ courts and the courts of first instance as a court of matters urgency and whether there is a respecting to the litigation levels in such courts. In the second section, this study focuses on the role of the appeal court as a court of urgency manners and the way of respecting the principle of litigation levels and the opportunity to ignore such principle. This study concludes that the litigation levels system in the matters urgency judgment in Oman and Jordan needs rebalancing in the litigation levels between the decisions regarding urgency matters and the courts as courts of matters urgency. This study also suggests that there should be some reforms with respect to this system.