dc.contributor.author | Javaria, Kiran | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-19T07:50:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-19T07:50:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-12-01 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2469-259X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://journal.uob.edu.bh:443/handle/123456789/357 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the financial performance of Islamic and conventional banks from Malaysia. For this purpose, 5 Islamic and 5 conventional banks in Malaysia are selected for the time period of 5 years from 2009 to 2013. For comparing financial performance, internal factors such as financial ratios are choosing. These financial ratios named as profitability, liquidity and credit risk with Bank-0-Meter model to calculate solvency. Statistical tools such as T-test and F-test are used to analyze the data. F test for comparing sample variance and T test for comparing sample means. Findings suggest that in terms of profitability and credit risk, conventional banks are in leading position and in terms of liquidity; Islamic banks are in leading position. But if see the result closely the difference in profitability and solvency is not significantly higher. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Bahrain | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Islamic and conventional bank | en_US |
dc.subject | Solvency | en_US |
dc.subject | Profitability | en_US |
dc.subject | Liquidity | en_US |
dc.subject | Credit-risk | en_US |
dc.title | Comparative Analysis of Islamic and Conventional Banks: A Case study from Malaysia | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/JIFS/020209 | |
dc.volume | 02 | |
dc.issue | 02 | |
dc.source.title | Journal of Islamic Financial Studies | |
dc.abbreviatedsourcetitle | JIFS |
The following license files are associated with this item: